Digital currencies without Bitcoin
Argument 1. "A Kind" of Bitcoin Was Inevitable
Bitcoin didn’t come into existence all at once – its foundations were built on decades of previous attempts to create digital money. Back in 1990, David Chaum developed DigiCash, an anonymous payment system that used cryptography to protect user privacy, but its centralized nature prevented it from achieving wider acceptance. Later, e-gold offered a digital currency backed by gold reserves, but it ran into regulatory hurdles. In 2005, Nick Szabo went a step further with Bit Gold, a concept of a decentralized digital currency that used cryptographic puzzles and a public ledger. Although it was never implemented, Bit Gold was the obvious predecessor of Bitcoin. Moreover, the foundations of blockchain technology were laid back in the early 1990s through the work of Stuart Haber and W. Scott Stornette, who designed a cryptographically secured timestamp for digital documents. All these innovations indicate that some kind of Bitcoin was inevitable – even if Satoshi Nakamoto hadn’t created Bitcoin, someone would have come up with a similar solution sooner or later.
Source: cointelegraph
Argument 2. Without Bitcoin, crypto would be delayed for decades
Without Bitcoin, there is a high probability that cryptocurrencies would not even exist in a recognizable form today. Projects like DigiCash and e-gold have shown serious challenges such as centralization, regulatory hurdles, and scalability issues, and no solution has been able to overcome these hurdles until the advent of Bitcoin. Even Nick Szabo’s Bit Gold didn’t completely address the issue of decentralized consensus, but was intended more as a reserve currency than an everyday means of payment. Bitcoin was a key milestone – without it, even altcoins would have nothing to build their infrastructure on. Litecoin, created in 2011, has improved its design precisely on the basis of Bitcoin’s innovations. Ethereum, while having a broader vision of decentralized applications, relied on Bitcoin’s proven technology as proof that decentralized networks can work. Even Ripple, although designed for institutional transactions, has profited from the credibility that Bitcoin has brought to blockchain technology. Bitcoin’s proof-of-work (PoW) was a model for a number of early cryptocurrencies, and if it didn’t exist, the exploration of alternative mechanisms such as proof-of-stake (PoS) or DAGs could have been delayed for years. Additionally, without Bitcoin, advances in cryptographic security, decentralized governance, and blockchain scalability would likely occur at a much slower pace. In other words, the financial world without Bitcoin would look completely different – and far less innovative.
Source: cointelegraph
Bitcoin's Impact on the Global Financial System
Argument 1. A Potentially Better Life Without Bitcoin
Without Bitcoin, the incentive to research and apply blockchain technology might be significantly weaker, and financial institutions would likely be more cautious about investing in decentralized systems. However, this is exactly where some see the positive side – the capital that was directed into cryptocurrencies during the 2010s could have ended up in other fast-growing industries. Fintech, which was already transforming the financial sector through mobile banking, online payments, and peer-to-peer lending, could have thrived even faster. Artificial intelligence and machine learning may become key parts of various industries sooner, while renewables would attract more investment, accelerating the development of solar and wind technology. Also, biotechnology and personalized medicine could have made revolutionary breakthroughs in healthcare earlier. In addition to missed investment opportunities, there is also the question of tax revenues – without cryptocurrencies, fewer people would avoid taxation, which would increase government revenues. Research has shown that a significant portion of crypto-assets remain undeclared, and the industry has also led to billions of dollars lost in fraud, large capital outflows from economies, and even funding for shady regimes and criminal activities. All this leads to the conclusion that the world without Bitcoin would not only be different – it might even be better.
Source: cointelegraph
Argument 2. Bitcoin was needed for global financial progress
Bitcoin has served as a catalyst for financial innovation, particularly in the field of decentralized finance (DeFi). Its success has proven the sustainability of blockchain technology and spurred the development of numerous applications beyond digital currencies, including data governance, security, and decentralized governance. These technologies are used today in logistics, healthcare, and even voting systems, increasing transparency and security. Additionally, cryptocurrency transactions allow for lower fees – while traditional international transfers can cost up to 10% commission, crypto transfers significantly reduce these costs. Also, transactions are faster and more efficient than traditional bank transfers, which often take days. Bitcoin has also contributed to financial inclusion, allowing people without access to banking services to participate in the global economy. Without it, the world would still rely on slower and more expensive centralized systems. Its influence is especially visible in developing countries – in 2021, El Salvador became the first country to adopt Bitcoin as an official currency, which boosted tourism, foreign investment, and made it easier to send remittances through the Chivo wallet. Similarly, in Kenya, Bitcoin provides financial services to people without bank accounts, proving its potential in improving global financial inclusion. Bitcoin was not just an innovation – it was a necessary step towards a more efficient and equitable financial system.
Source: cointelegraph
Without Bitcoin: Would the World Be Better or Worse?
Thinking about a world without Bitcoin raises many questions and possibilities, many of which are conditioned by a number of interrelated factors. Would another digital currency appear in its place, or would the development of blockchain technology be postponed indefinitely? It is true that we can speculate, but we will never know for sure what the world would look like without Bitcoin. Rapid technology developments, regulatory decisions, and market forces are constantly shaping the financial ecosystem, making it impossible to make a final judgment on whether the world would be better or worse without Bitcoin. What is certain is that Bitcoin has left a lasting mark on the global financial system – and its emergence will continue to shape innovation for years to come.
We hope you enjoyed reading today’s blog, if you have any questions or suggestions you can always contact us on our social networks (Twitter, Instagram).
